How to refer to animals and magical creatures compassionately + magical alternatives to outdated idioms

​Dumbledore said it best in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: 
“Words are, in my not-so-humble opinion, our most inexhaustible source of magic. Capable of both inflicting injury, and remedying it.”

While we may not agree with all of Dumbledore’s beliefs and actions, this is one that we at The Protego Foundation can completely get behind. 

​Our words matter. The language we use has power, and it, like Albus himself acknowledges, can be a tool to harm and to heal. To confront and to comfort. To connect and to challenge.

---

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire where Hermione first introduces us to S.P.E.W

Speaking our mind, be it verbally or in writing, gives us agency. It changes us from passive bystanders to active participants in not only our life but in the bigger world around us. 

And when we make mistakes, which we will again and again and again, we can learn from where we slipped up. We can continue to do better. To be better. 

So muster up your inner Hermione Granger and a fierce, can-do attitude and pin on your favorite S.P.E.W. buttons, because we’re about to liberate our language towards animals and magical creatures!

Before we can go all Granger and talk about language that’s used to devalue magical creatures and animals, first we need to look at what exactly that language means. 

​Let’s start with the words themself. Consider the ones used to describe these magical creatures we encounter in the Wizarding World: ​

---

• Carriage Thestral 
• Gringotts Goblin
• Post Owl
• House Elf

What do you notice about these magical creatures—or, in the case of the goblins and elves, beings?

Is there anything that stands out? 

In a knutshell, these phrases list the magical creatures as secondary. In these terms, their usefulness to wizardkind defines them. 

Person-first (or in this case, magical creature-first) language flips the script. It nixes words that are exploitative and gives magical creatures (or people) their identity and agency back.

Another way to think of the stark difference between the two is this: close your eyes and visualize Diagon Alley, then Knockturn Alley. Even though both shopping districts are in the same magical space, they couldn’t be more opposite. The language we used in the first example compared to the second one is a similar contrast! 

This concept also holds true in the muggle world. We can take this concept of a more liberating, magical creature-first language and apply it to our animal friends in the muggle world. 

Here are some of the most common ways to describe animals in ways that devalue them: 

• Zoo animal
• Circus elephant
• Farm animal 
• Lab rat ​​

Image courtesy of Warner Bros. Entertainment, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindewald

Here’s what we mean by that:

• Thestrals who pull carriages
• Goblins who work at Gringotts
• Owls who deliver post
• Elves who work in houses 

See the difference? 

Although both the original and revised phrases are essentially saying the same thing, it’s how they are said that leaves the most impact. These phrases shift the focus to these magical creatures and beings so that we see them as individuals.

Many of us are exposed to this exploitative language from birth. Through picture books, coloring books, television shows, movies, toys, games, and even interactions with our friends, family, neighbors, and caregivers, these words become the standard for how we see the animals around us as young muggles and how we behave towards them. 

For another example, take the way we often refer to dogs, cats, bunnies, and other animal companions as “pets,” and their humans as “owners”. 

Those two words alone wield tremendous power. “Pets” reduces these animals and all of their individuality and complexity into an “it” that “belongs” to someone. Kind of sad, right?

Using the alternative “companion animal” or “animal companion” ditches domineering and oppressive language for a more positive and healthy description of our relationships with our feline, canine, and rodent friends.

​It doesn’t stop there, though! It isn’t just the words we use to describe animals that can devalue them, but also words that have us symbolically interacting with them. A prime example? Idioms! 

For conscientious animal lovers, many of the most common Western idioms are, in a word, harsh. These memorable, snappy, and “harmless” phrases that are so ingrained in our culture are really, well, kind of morbid. 

Victoria's companion animal, Paco!

Image courtesy of Warner Bros. Entertainment

Consider:
Grab the bull by its horns
Kill two birds with one stone
Be the guinea pig 
Stop beating a dead horse 

Oooof. Not so nice, right?

Now let’s take a minute to recontextualize these animals as magical creatures in the Wizarding World. Could you see Hermione Granger using any of these idioms? 

Kill two Bowtruckles with one stone
There’s more than one way to skin a Kneazle 
Grab the Hippogriff by his claws 
Stop beating a dead Puffskein 

Eeek. Very not nice.

Buckbeak is not impressed.

So we’re riddikulusly excited to present you with these alternative wizarding world creature-friendly idioms!

Ultimately, it isn’t just what we say that matters, but how we say it. 

Our own Ali Matthews, Finance and Development Director here at The Protego Foundation, has a lot to share on the subject. She’s even pursuing a Master’s degree in Animal Studies and Linguistics at NYU! 

Be sure to check back soon for a Q & A with Ali about liberating language. 

​Written by Victoria Tomis

---

Accio More ARTICLES: